You are not answering the question. You are asserting the one do the twisting and re-interpretation is me.
Why don't you assume it was always clearly about Muta but was translated wrong and interpreted wrong by rulers to justify slavery and since Umar forbid Muta, they didn't want people to see Muta all over the Quran?
Why am I been told that my interpretation is insincere to what the author meant and not the corrupt rulers who sabotaged who the wage of the Quran called to and oppressed them?
Why don't you assume it was always clearly about Muta but was translated wrong and interpreted wrong by rulers to justify slavery and since Umar forbid Muta, they didn't want people to see Muta all over the Quran?
Why am I been told that my interpretation is insincere to what the author meant and not the corrupt rulers who sabotaged who the wage of the Quran called to and oppressed them?
