RE: "who your Oaths give access over" vs "right hand possess"
November 10, 2018 at 4:23 pm
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2018 at 5:02 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(November 10, 2018 at 4:05 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: That's a different subject.
It’s the same subject. You believe a book can prove itself, and you are attempting to do just that with this thread. That you’re comfortable with your own fallacious reasoning is a “you” problem, not an “us” problem.
Quote:I believe whether it's content can be reflected in the heart and mind to be seen as a miracle is possible
Yes, as I said, we’re well aware that you believe your book has magical powers.
Quote:We can discuss your assessment of Quran proving itself to be circular reasoning, but, it's not the topic of this thread.
There is really nothing to discuss. If you do not insist Quran is magical, then using it to prove itself is circular. If you insist Quran is magical, you now have two assertions to demonstrate: that magic exists, and that Quran is magical, lol.
So, which route would you like to take? Would you rather argue in a circle or try to defend bare assertions?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
