RE: "who your Oaths give access over" vs "right hand possess"
November 12, 2018 at 1:06 pm
(This post was last modified: November 12, 2018 at 1:08 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(November 12, 2018 at 12:08 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I am saying... this is my stance. I'm not saying you should believe it. And whether I should or not, that's up to debate, but I have to be able to present evidence that I perceive and my thought process on that evidence, or there will be nothing to discuss!
Why should that be your stance, if, when I’m telling you it’s MY stance for Christianity, that’s not enough to persuade you I’m right? If I can’t persuade you into Christianity with the same reasons you use for your belief in Islam, why do you think we should be persuaded by those very same reasons into Islam? Lol.
A singular method that leads to two different, mutually exclusive conclusions, is a shitty, invalid method.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.