RE: [Quranic Reflection]: sex and love
July 27, 2019 at 9:20 pm
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2019 at 9:31 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(July 27, 2019 at 5:24 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote:(July 27, 2019 at 1:46 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Quite interesting that Atlas likes to explain to us the supernatural (Allah) while he doesn't yet understand the natural ( homosexuality)!
If homosexuality is natural, then the mating would produce children.
I never saw a pregnant man.
Homosexuality is natural because it naturally occurs. This is the only criteria for whether it is natural.
Whether you ever saw a pregnant man, no one cares.
(July 27, 2019 at 5:22 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote:(July 27, 2019 at 12:30 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: I agree with you here. But (just for the sake of argument), let's assume you might be wrong. Let's delve into the issue
I mean, what if homosexuality IS unnatural? So what?
If we are going to ask this question, first we must ask ourselves what the word "unnatural" even means... and how something that happens in the natural world--like gay sex--can qualify as "unnatural."
And even if gay sex IS unnatural... does that make it immoral? Is that, like, a rule? "All unnatural things are immoral?"
I guess the rule would go something like: "If something is "unnatural" (whatever the fuck that means) it is therefore immoral."
So does that mean virtual reality is immoral? What about Pokemon? Fuck, I mean, what about science fiction novels?
I'm confused.
Males evolved to mate with women and vice versa; we can mark that by the pregnancy the female goes through after a sexual encounter with a male: in other words that's the function their bodies are designed to do; thus it is the natural thing to happen.
For the example; the eyes' natural function is to "see"; not to "hear".
The nose's natural function is to smell; not to "see".
So as the penis: it's natural function is to mate with a female vagina to produce children.
Nothing is designed. They fell into roles in their bearing population’s (not just their indiidual’s) survival through long and complex series of selections whose criteria is far too numerous, complicate, and often subtle, and most importantly, ever changing, for the likes of you to imagine, much less comprehend.