[Serious] Time to embrace Islam!

[The Architect Of Fate]

@Abaddon_ire

Sincerely, you have responded better than I could have to the user in question. Still... my response... Thanks!

The whole problem with you people is that you overcomplicate matters, when things are and should be simple.  A coherent definition of god would be like this : the unique immortal, omnipotent and omniscient being.

In all honesty, I don't mean to "overcomplicate" matters, to the contrary, I mean to clarify what you're asking. So what physical properties does "god" have, if any?

Why did I define God like that? Because it's the only interesting definition. Any mortal being will cease to exist and won't interfere in any way with any creature nor will meet us in an eventual afterlife.

Interesting, according to who? And how have you come to define the "afterlife" in this way?

And you seem, like everyone here, to be overly repugnant of theology, which is your former religion's fault, and not any other religion.

While you and I may have different opinions of theology, I find the "subject" to be interesting, as well as the study of religion.

Saying no is never an answer to anything buddy. Not assuming (just as not knowing) something exists doesn't mean you're certain you won't change your mind later. Again, you're arbitrarily objecting to any clarification I try to make.

What do you mean that I'm "saying no"...? And no, I never said "not assuming... something exists" was the same as "you're certain you won't change your mind later"...

Did you spend some time looking up what the Isnad is all about, or just cannot help the urge of accusing us of circularity?

No, I didn't. Are you claiming that this is a source for your claim?

Spoilers  Isnad is  circular itself