RE: The code that is DNA
December 3, 2019 at 5:01 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2019 at 5:09 pm by Yukon_Jack.)
(December 3, 2019 at 2:05 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: [quote='Yukon_Jack' pid='1945297'
Just give one other example of nature being able to produce a code at all. Never mind one with a translation mechanism and error correction, I don’t want to burden you with that part. Just one and I’ll become an atheist
Brewer gave you exactly what you asked for (more actually, since you were given two). And now this isn't good enough. You want DNA denounced as a code.
You want DNA to be a code. Fine, let's call it a code. TWO other codes produced by nature have been presented to you. You are now an atheist.
Boru
[/quote]
No he gave me links to prime numbers and the fibanacci series which describes a ratio.
Neither of these has an arbitrary sequence that gets decoded nor translated upon an agreed upon set of rules, like DNA
Quote:I accept that DNA is code. I'll give you that one. I understand that it is complex and there isn't anything like it in nature.
Snowflakes are complex and unique unto themselves but they, like DNA, are created through emergent properties of physics.
Now define your God and explain the mechanism by which you understand it to exist.
Well then you and polymath contradict ea other, He says categorically that DNA is not a code!
Snowflakes are the result of property of physics , they do not get decoded thus are in no way a code