The code that is DNA

[Abaddon_ire]

I did not suggest ALL speciation takes deep time.  Otherwise it would not be observed in the lab (Lenski) or in fish populations. From the LCA to now is a different matter. Don’t quote papers out of context with this discussion.

That wasn't a paper that was a textbook. It doesn't matter what things you meant to suggest deep time applies to, time is not the distinguishing factor between micro and macroevolution. Everything takes time; it's like saying the difference between a bath and a shower is the time people spend taking them.

Well it does. A bath consumes 10 times the fresh water of a shower. More resources are consumed by a bath than a shower.

A bath perpetuates any bacteria washed from the skin. A shower does not.

I could go on.

The point is that your simplistic analogy ignores confounding factors. Science does not.

---

Nope i stated a fact back by the fact he did 

By all means


Yeah well that never happened unlike Tours straw man .Which is of course why his doesn't bother me .


Had to know something that never happened .Unlike Tour whom i watched do so . 


All right then you stand by that thing that never happened and i'll stand by the thing that did happen .I think that makes us both happy .

You talk like a juvenile, no offense, so  until you can back something up, you should refrain from posting meaningless accusations.

Your feeble attempt to suppress your interlocutors is noted, but futile. 

If you are unable to answer even simple questions, that is your problem, nobody else's.

---

The error of time can be illustrated, perhaps poorly, by taking any two species and asking what distinguishes the two. The difference between a cat and a dog, for example, isn't X number of seconds. Among other things it is the type and number of nucleotides, genes, or chromosomes they have; and how they are phenotypically expressed.

And cats and dogs share a common ancestor. Along with bears.

Had you a point you wished to make?