RE: The code that is DNA
December 28, 2019 at 3:05 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2019 at 4:23 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Well I already mentioned Lenski and the fact that after MANY thousands of mutation induced generations on fruit flies, there is zero macro evolution to wit. Unless you call a 2 headed fly evolutionNo you misused Lenski,s work to come to stupid conclusion . You know Lenski the guy who accepts Maro evolution happens .
Quote:That would be considered creation.Nothing because it's a fairytale
Quote:And if there is no macro evolution and abiogenesis, what would the default be?Fallacy
Quote: (Try google the drastic improbability of getting a simple protein to form let alone multiple complex ones)You tried this trick already it failed you then it fails you now.
Quote:What would be an example of a scientific fact, for example? Even scientific laws are understood to be descriptions, not facts, precisely because a "black swan" could appear at some point undermining the observations described by them.Nope it remains a fact .I know you don't like that but a fact it remains
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM