The code that is DNA

[The Architect Of Fate]

No you misused  Lenski,s work to come to stupid conclusion . You know Lenski the guy who accepts Maro evolution happens .

---

Nothing because it's a fairytale




Fallacy



You tried this trick already it failed you then it fails you now.

---

Nope it  remains a fact .I know you don't like that but a fact it remains

“I stand by it”
Ha ha lol

So you stand by

Misrepresenting a scientists work .A scientist who accepts the thing you insist his work proves false . 

Logical fallacies

And statical trickey to back a fallacious point   

Alrighty then meanwhile i'll stand  by the opposite of that.

There's a reason why biologist make a distinction between microevolution, speciation, and macroevolution. Consider for instance that if gradual changes simply accumulate within a single population across x number of generation, speciation never takes place.

This example fails and is just another creationist  attempt to split hairs so you can deny evolution

---

That would be considered creation. And if there is no macro evolution and abiogenesis, what would the default be? (Try google the drastic improbability of getting a simple protein to form let alone multiple complex ones)

Macro evolution is just lots of micro evolution.

More or less

---

Macro evolution is just lots of micro evolution.

Yeah, Saying "I believe in micro evolution but not in macro evolution" is like saying "I believe in minutes but not in hours, and definitely not in years and decades".

Yup it's just an attempt to have their cake and eat it too .Scientific facts aren't jars of candy they get to pick and choose what they like and get to deny the rest because it conflicts with their ideology.