RE: The code that is DNA
December 30, 2019 at 12:08 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2019 at 12:11 pm by R00tKiT.)
(December 30, 2019 at 11:53 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Why would god need to fine tune the entire cosmos for our existence to be possible? Do you have any idea how epically stupid that sounds?
Even more * epically stupid * is this question, you're assuming God needs fine tuning + that fine tuning is only for us, when there could've been countless forms of life elsewhere in the universe.
Another strawman question because you don't take the time to understand what's written.
(December 30, 2019 at 11:53 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Special pleading. *yawn*
You're just mumbling fallacies' names without understanding my point, as usual. A necessary first cause is logically forced. We call it God. Calling something God merely defines it, there is no special pleading involved whatsoever.
(December 30, 2019 at 11:53 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: The difference is that we have actual evidence for evolution, whereas you have no evidence of tuning or a tuner.
You don't, you have guesswork, arbitrary inference and occasionally, fraud, when it comes to processes taking billions of years to operate.
A tuner is a very reasonable explanation for the existence of tuning (duh.)
(December 30, 2019 at 11:46 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(December 30, 2019 at 10:32 am)Klorophyll Wrote: Even in Geology, you have theories, not laws. The theory of tectonic plates, for instance, is considered to still need empirical support with the help of modern geographical equipments.Scientfic laws are part of any theory of any scietific discipline.
Even in Geology you have laws. Newtons law of gravity that determines what plates slide above/below others in subduction zones, being a part of the theory of plate tectonics.
Newton's law of gravity belongs to physics, it's not geology's invention. Just stop mixing things up just to respond with anything, Gosh;
