RE: The code that is DNA
December 31, 2019 at 9:14 pm
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2019 at 9:17 pm by Yukon_Jack.)
(December 31, 2019 at 3:35 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: The trouble, for the umpteenth time, Yukon..is that we have observed speciation in the lab and in the field. Not just speciation, and not just once, but cladogenesis as well, multiple times. You can even produce this effect at home without any complicated equipment.The greater point is that you haven’t observed or have the proof of one species turning into another completely different kind of creature.
Unless it's wholly unimportant to you for the things you post to be true, this complaint is DOA. You could still field the objection, in a more accurate form, ofc. We have yet to observe human speciation, for example. We've seen that we came from something else - but not that something has come from us. Maybe the thing that we know can happen, that has happened, won't happen. Who knows why. The same factors are in play - but this could be the one instance in which the ball falls up.
Ultimately, this is what creationists like you, or like John, believe. It's not really the case that you don't believe in biology or facts. Now is it. There, cutting to the chase.
One w new novel features or body plans, ever
(December 31, 2019 at 4:56 pm)no one Wrote: Be honest potato head, this infatuation you have with fruit flies is because, no matter how you try, your mental aptitudes can not rival theirs.Wrong, it shows macro evolution ain’t happening