RE: The code that is DNA
December 31, 2019 at 9:40 pm
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2019 at 9:56 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:The greater point is that you haven’t observed or have the proof of one species turning into another completely different kind of creature.Keep repeating your ignorance .I doesn't refute Gae point .It only makes you look foolish
One w new novel features or body plans, ever
Quote:Wrong, it shows macro evolution ain’t happeningNope it shows you have no idea what your talking about and that know one should take you seriously.Oh wait mainstream biology already doesn't.
(December 31, 2019 at 3:35 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: The trouble, for the umpteenth time, Yukon..is that we have observed speciation in the lab and in the field. Not just speciation, and not just once, but cladogenesis as well, multiple times. You can even produce this effect at home without any complicated equipment.But Gae he didn't get his crocoduck therefore it hasn't happened because a creationist website told him so
Unless it's wholly unimportant to you for the things you post to be true, this complaint is DOA. You could still field the objection, in a more accurate form, ofc. We have yet to observe human speciation, for example. We've seen that we came from something else - but not that something has come from us. Maybe the thing that we know can happen, that has happened, won't happen. Who knows why. The same factors are in play - but this could be the one instance in which the ball falls up.
Ultimately, this is what creationists like you, or like John, believe. It's not really the case that you don't believe in biology or facts. Now is it. There, cutting to the chase.
Meanwhile all the actual biologists (including Richard Lenski) stick to what's actually been observed that disagrees with his ignorant ramblings
Who should we side with i wonder 🤔
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM