(January 9, 2020 at 2:19 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: According to Sungula, anyone can make any claim about someone that is unsubstantiated and that’s ok.Sungula is correct. Anyone can make any claim and it is OK to make any claim.
That stops nobody from observing that the claimant has a burden of proof for said affirmative claim.
For example, I claim that an army of pixies transport your posts to my screen by miraculous means. Prove me wrong.
See how that works?
(January 9, 2020 at 2:19 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: That’s libelous, see how far that gets you, it doesn’t work on me or anyone w an honest brain.No libel involved. Do you automatically accept my claim of millions of internet pixies or do you reject it unless I~ provide evidence for such claimed pixies?
(January 9, 2020 at 2:19 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: so for the record, Tour made NO straw man and Sungula is a dishonest atheist for saying soTour plainly strawmanned. Deal with it. That is your problem, not anyone else's.
(January 9, 2020 at 2:19 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote:Sure, mutations are absolutely random. Evolution is not random. Do you even have the vaguest idea why that might be? I bet you don't.(January 8, 2020 at 12:17 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: If he indicated in the video that if nature produced the 'machinery of cells' through random processes; that would be a mischaracterization of biological evolution, natural selection would have been key to that development and it's not random at all. As a mischaracterization of the actual claim of the theory, it would be a strawman.
NO straw man whatsoever. Mutations are TOTALLY random. Do you understand Darwinism don’t you?
