RE: [Quranic Reflection]: Magic
January 1, 2020 at 2:40 am
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: (December 31, 2019 at 7:54 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Amusing that you cite as evidence SOMETHING THAT NEVER HAPPENED.
There was no moses, no exodus exile or any such crap. Any minute now, you will be citing the chariot wheels in the red sea as though it had not been comprehensively dismissed.
Have you any actual evidence? Nothing else matters. So far, nothing. Can you do better?
My evidence is the universe and the patterns repeating in it, every tiny thing -from atoms- to gigantic objects like "planets" fit together.
No they don't.
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: If a fraction differed; the universe will be no more.
Then there would be some other universe.
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Humans were even capable of using the laws that "glue" the pieces of the universe together, and science was born from observing and understanding these laws.
So what?
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: The laws of physics are obsolete without a heavenly hand implementing them in the first place,
Wild claim with no evidence.
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Newton was a theist.
Newton was an alchemist also. Is alchemy thus true?
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Einestine believed in some form of God; too:
False.
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Quote:On 24 April 1929, Einstein cabled Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein in German: "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."[24]
[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_and_philosophical_views_of_Albert_Einstein#cite_note-24][/url]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_...rsonal_God
Followed by the usual list of quotes.
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Studying science honestly must lead you to the point where you find the laws of physics "already there" for you to use.
Because physics is not proscriptive. It is descriptive. Try to understand that.
(December 31, 2019 at 10:37 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: That's my evidence.
So you have no evidence at all. OK.