(January 26, 2020 at 2:55 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: “Because it is, as many people have repeatedly explained to you. Rigged, by selection.“Correct. But nobody claimed it did, only you.
NS has ZERO creative ability.
(January 26, 2020 at 2:55 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: You deep down are aware that evolution depends on chance lucky mutations 100% of the time but keep harking back to NS being the engine, it’s not.Mutations happen 100% of the time. Your own existence demonstrates that. Do you understand that? Of course not. On average, a zygote will have mother and fathers DNA plus 128 random mutations. This is why you are not a mere 50/50 mix of your parents.
(January 26, 2020 at 2:55 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: Bacteria have always had resistance capabilities it’s just that some of these that have certain traits survive to appear to have mutated this resistance.Hahahaha. Now you are supporting evolution. Too funny.
(January 26, 2020 at 2:55 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: those owls eyes are quite a work of Art, and how lucky a butterfly mutated them, it’s like a perfect world!Except that it isn't. If it were perfect, no owl could ever eat a butterfly. And that does not happen. Conversely, if all owls could spot every butterfly, there would be no butterflies left and that does not happen either. How, in your opinion, does that play out?