(February 3, 2020 at 2:09 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I think YJ deserves a tip of the hat. When defending the idiocy of intelligent design, certain things are absolutely crucial.Add
-Maintain a strict, willful ignorance of evolution and how it operates.
-Never address the facts and arguments of your opponents.
-Repeat your misinformed opinion and false facts frequently.
-Don’t offer a mechanism for design.
-Above all, always substitute invective, bad language, and personal insults in place of actual debate.
YJ has adhered to these with a doggedness which would make a charging rhino gulp with disbelief. Kirk Cameron would be proud.
Boru
Relies on the opinion of one scientist in face of the whole consensus
Relies on logical fallacies
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM