RE: By chance?
February 11, 2020 at 7:40 pm
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2020 at 7:46 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:So Bilateral symmetry ensures the eyes are spaced apart just perfectly, my!Yay more personal incredulity pretending to be a response
Quote:“said mutations are 100% random”Nope you're the one lying here.But that's to be expected you are a creationist after all
False ”
Nope, you are false, mutations are 100% random. This is your crutch to lie about this.
NS can do absolutely nothing in the way of developing new traits because mutations are what causes new traits to emerge.
Your repeated lies to this not helping your cause
And my "cause " has already won and is the only legit mainstream science.So i don't need to lie .
(February 11, 2020 at 7:08 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:True(February 11, 2020 at 6:43 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Not mention it's not always successful
And more interestingly why would a god put owl eyes on a butterfly when he would have any other option ?
Exactly.
But no matter how evolution selects for survival advantages, creationists would be pointing to those as the work of a god. A very inefficient god, but a god nonetheless.
There are many species of butterflies, that are extremely colorful and are the least camouflaged of all, but they taste bad to predators. So, their survival advantage is to advertise their identity of tasting bad, by being gaudy.
Bad taste must be created by god, too. Not as impressive as flashy owl eye patterns, though.
When 'god did it' is your panacea to explain everything, it actually explains nothing. It has no explanatory power.
As soon as one can substitute, 'butterfly designing gnomes are responsible for owl eye patterns on butterfly wings' in place of 'a god is responsible', and lose nothing in explanatory power, you know your explanation is useless.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM