(May 22, 2020 at 1:20 am)WinterHold Wrote:
(May 21, 2020 at 4:24 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Uhhh.. what?
Perhaps you should 'Back up' a step. You are aware that the British SAS are ARMY special froces, right?
As in... Military personel trained to a very high skill level that then specialize in certain feilds of which "Counter Terrorism" is but onew facet?
The British government. Instead of ARMING their police to deal with dangerous threats. Keep their police 'relativly' unarmed ( I think there are special 'FLying Squads' but I don't want to digress) and, instead, spend the time, effort and money to specially pick and train professoinals of their armed forces to help bolster their policing force.
Now.. if you then ALSO want to besmirch an armed force who can trace its history quite a distance into past history? That's fine. I'll let possible forum members set your misunderstanding about such straight.
So... It would seem that you DON'T know why British police are unarmed while American police generally are?
As for your remabling in relation to 'Healing' and such? I am going to be generous and think that your handling of the English language is, sadly, not up to the task of translating yout thoughts.
Interesting.
Sorry, I meant "SCO19 Specialist Firearms Command"; despite their nerdy name they are armed to the teeth, so not SAS; sorry.
I understand English quite well, been using it since I was a child, so get over your imperialist ego will you? It's a second language for me so.....
I translate my thoughts quite well too, I am a programmer so we program in English if you don't know. As for the matter at hand, police in the UK is still armed but the arming is for special ranks like the SSFC, so the matter didn't change a lot: they are still armed because some criminals need to be terrorized.
Right. So a specialist team of specifically trained professionals within an already professional field.
Your paranoia seems to be speaking loudly here.
Again, much praise for you for your skills with a second language.
If you don't want compliments, simply say so and I'll be more than happy to present you with expletives instead.
So.. it's 'Bad' for the police to 'Terroize' criminals...
But it's quite okay for 'Some one' to terroize cimminals with the promise (Remeber, this is your thought experiment) of physical mutilation?
... Actually, that's something that needs to be adressed.
Who is it that you're suggesting should be cutting off all these appendages? Obviously NOT the terrify police, obviously.
So... who will you promote to 'Chief limb lopper'? Some one French, perhapse? After all, they gave us the 'Years of terror' and Madame Guillotene.
Cheers.
Not at work.