Islam

[Peebothuhlu]

   Right. So a specialist team of specifically trained professionals within an already professional field.

Your paranoia seems to be speaking loudly here.

Again, much praise for you for your skills with a second language.

If you don't want compliments, simply say so and I'll be more than happy to present you with expletives instead. 

So.. it's 'Bad' for the police to 'Terroize' criminals...

But it's quite okay for 'Some one' to terroize cimminals with the promise (Remeber, this is your thought experiment) of physical mutilation?

... Actually, that's something that needs to be adressed.

Who is it that you're suggesting should be cutting off all these appendages? Obviously NOT the terrify police, obviously.

So... who will you promote to 'Chief limb lopper'? Some one French, perhapse? After all, they gave us the 'Years of terror' and Madame Guillotene.

Cheers.

It's nice of you to mention the Guillotine, because the French revolution would never had succeeded without it. Without the terror the Guillotine put for the French corrupt royals -and their Christian bishops-  the success of the revolution would be no more.

So I gotta ask you; how is it legal and okay for western countries like France to use the Guillotine to clean the garbage in their communities, but we Muslims don't get that?

In other words we -Muslims- need our own French revolution, our own Guillotines to clean the garbage in our societies. You westerners would utilize the Guillotines soon enough too; I am sure. Especially when the right wing starts to roam more freely and commit more deadly crimes; you will miss capital punishment and will embed it again in your laws.

It's essential to cut a piece from corrupt criminals -like the French royals- because they are cutting our own bodies right now.

? What ?

The French revolution did NOT succeed.

It's chaos is what allowed Napoleon to rise to power and END the Revolution "Of the people, by the people." OR, as it's become (And demonstratably so) known as "The reign of terror."

I'm not the one saying whether the use of an amputating machine is a 'Good' thing. YOU are. I'm just offering a different example from history of a practice that it is YOU who are espousing.

So, you're NOT answering my question of;

"WHO gets to operate the limb amputating machine?"

Since, obviously, it CAN'T be the police in your opinioin since they are ALREADY terrorizing people.

THEN you have the temerity to say:

"It was okay for the French to do it. Why can't I do it?"

What, from the bottom of my actual heart, the FEK?

Do you NOT read how fekkin' stupid and moronic that sounds?

So... lets go back and have you please answer that first question, okay?

WHO gets to amputate the hands of the theives in your system?

Cheers.

Not at work.