RE: Islam
July 14, 2020 at 3:19 am
(This post was last modified: July 14, 2020 at 3:58 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:It's relevant if you rule out voting for a Muslim even when her policies are good. Or do you somehow insist, despite the evidence, that a Muslim can't have good policies?The policies are good because they are progressive , Nothing progressive flows from Islam
Quote:How strong is your anti-theist prejudice? Would you vote for a Catholic priest who supported good political policies?Nothing to do with bias Islam is Regressive . Catholicism is also regressive . The fact is most people don't follow it regressive dictates
Quote:So you agree that a person can hold Muslim beliefs and be a good person? That holding those beliefs doesn't make a person childish or anti-progressive?Yes Muslims can be good people . But only so long as they actually act on their beliefs
Quote:What about people who rely on religion like a support and a lamp?Then those people are fools
Quote:Do you think Ilhan Omar's goodness is necessarily in spite of her religion? Do you think it is a ball and chain for her, or a support and guide?In Spite her religion sure as hell didn't give her concept of gay rights
Quote:Yes, I think you're being very terse because you know you're in danger of sounding like a bigot. You don't want to say that bad religious views make Muslims bad.Stop putting words in his mouth and no he's not a bigot
Quote:This is common among prejudiced people. Only bad things can be attributed to the thing they disapprove of. If there is anything good associated with it, that good thing must be attributed to something else. So a person's religion gets all the blame, and none of the credit.Nope No prejudice Islam has produced no progressive views . Those views come from outside and can only be followed in contrast with it .
Quote:But you're unwilling to name anything specific about Islam which is intrinsically bad, and you won't differentiate between non-religious tradition in Muslim countries and essential religious views. This allows you to continue with a vague general view that Islam is bad, but not support your argument at all.Seriously this proves you know nothing . Because none of the regressive tradition are non religious . Nope he's given all the support he needs .Your simply an ass probing for accusations .
(July 14, 2020 at 3:13 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: Yeah, Belacqua, stop with your fallacies. We all know there are liberal Muslims but they are a minority and exclusively in non-muslim countries and they are liberal in spite of Islam and not because of it. It is enough to look at what is happening in Chechnya right now:But...But that's not intersect to Islam . It just so happen most of the worlds agree homosexuality is a sin .
I mean where are all those gay loving Muslims to save those gays defending them with their pro-gay Koranic verses if they are such a majority? Do you know where they are, Belacqua? In your dreams.
A Muslim can be a good person .Good or bad has nothing to do with religion .
A Muslim can hold progressive views so long as they ignore the conflict with their Islamic views
A Muslim can be intelligent as long he ignores the absurdity of is religion
A Muslim should be tolerated as long as they ignore those views or never act on the more destructive elements of their religion
Prepare yourself for Islam apologetics . The most dominant will be "but that's not Islam" . Despite pretty much every majority country doing it . Despite Scholars and clerics insisting it's Islamic .
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM