RE: Health advocates do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission
June 10, 2020 at 8:24 pm
(This post was last modified: June 10, 2020 at 8:38 pm by Agnostico.)
(June 10, 2020 at 5:12 pm)tackattack Wrote: I don't personally feel persecuted. Must be subjective.
It is, that's why I said some people
(June 10, 2020 at 12:52 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: 1. Mandatory vaccination isn't really all that extreme. Most developed nations do it anyway to some degree.
2. You got attacked at first because you labeled the thread in a misleading way. Then they attacked your views when you tried to elaborate on them.
3. There's not much of a contradiction between acknowledging that those who question the timing have valid points, but also acknowledging that there's a damn good reason for said protests, and that if the consequences can be mitigated, it might be good after all. And your apparent rejection of said reason may very well have pushed me further in the latter direction.
4. You want to know what I was talking about? Here's the actual post:
(April 23, 2020 at 1:20 am)Agnostico Wrote: Well at least i got down to the truth of it...
U guys are afraid of being infected despite being vaccinated cos u don't trust the vaccine yourselves...
The context was pretty clear, and a direct link to the thread and posts in question should appear in the quote itself: You were running around like a chicken with your head cut off at the prospect of a mandatory COVID-19 vaccine, talking about it like said vaccine actually existed yet. Abbadon reminded you that said vaccine does not, in fact, exist yet, and somehow you decided this means people who support mandatory vaccinations do so even though they don't trust the vaccine themselves.
The reaction of literally any person with two brain cells to rub together:
What does any of this have to do with the CNN article that this thread is about?
And how does an opinion on vaccines equal hatred? Hatred for who?
