Classical and operant conditioning make testable predictions. Too many here are focused on early theorists while ignoring Skinner and the like.
For those who wax philosophical over every little thing (eyeroll included), let me ask: do we really want a science that links neurology to thoughts? Because that's sounds dystopian AF.
For those who wax philosophical over every little thing (eyeroll included), let me ask: do we really want a science that links neurology to thoughts? Because that's sounds dystopian AF.