Quote:Your argument seemed be that if we don't accept abortion, it will/might lead to forced kidney donations.
No we're saying if you can justify using someone else's body for one purpose why not another.
Quote: That's no different from arguing that if we don't reject abortion, we're setting a legal precedent for mothers to legally euthanize their babies within the first six months of life as a belated abortion.Nope, totally different euthanase has nothing to do with bodily autonomy. It's not the same as force pregnancy.
Quote:We shouldn't accept/deny abortion on the basis of some other worse thing we don't want.Yes we should because again if you can justify one violation why not others? Your example deals with two different things.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
