An instrumental rationality would still have aspects of practicality, moral oughts and such wouldn't it? I guess the OP is dependent on what "better" means and what is in the scope of rationality/irrationalness.
If you're asking whether a 100% logical and unemotional populous would be an improvement to society as a whole, sure in some ways, but I would guess that in some important ways it would not "improve life" for much in society, IMO.
If you're asking whether a 100% logical and unemotional populous would be an improvement to society as a whole, sure in some ways, but I would guess that in some important ways it would not "improve life" for much in society, IMO.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari