RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
September 7, 2021 at 8:39 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2021 at 8:41 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(September 7, 2021 at 8:32 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Now watch him invent word salad to cover his ass(September 7, 2021 at 8:24 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: The universe's existence is used as a premise in a posteriori arguments for God, not as direct evidence. Premise and evidence aren't the same thing.
Be very, very careful. Backpedaling that fast could get your trousers caught in the bike chain.
Boru
(September 7, 2021 at 8:39 pm)brewer Wrote:Pretty much as the diffrence is negligible(September 7, 2021 at 7:56 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Category mistake: asking for concrete/empirical evidence for the existence of a non-empirical being.
Your request is logically invalid
I consider your belief logically invalid. Don't you mean a non-existent being, accept as a mental construct, the same as with other imaginary beings?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM