RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
September 7, 2021 at 8:58 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2021 at 9:00 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(September 7, 2021 at 8:49 pm)brewer Wrote:I love how he thinks he can define the issue away. As if that makes his case any better(September 7, 2021 at 8:44 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: What @brewer is asking for is some empirically measurable way to discern God's existence, there is clearly something syntactically incoherent about his request, since God is usually defined as a disembodied mind.
And yet my request remains. I don't care how you define god anymore then how you define dragons.
(September 7, 2021 at 8:47 pm)Foxaire Wrote: Funny OP should write for The Babylon Bee.Oh come now they have standards
(September 7, 2021 at 8:47 pm)brewer Wrote:Nothing if he did have something better we would have seen it by now(September 7, 2021 at 8:24 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: The universe's existence is used as a premise in a posteriori arguments for God, not as direct evidence. Premise and evidence aren't the same thing.
I reject the premise. Back to arguing god into existence I see, very naughty.
What else ya got?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM