RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
September 8, 2021 at 11:47 am
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2021 at 11:50 am by Anomalocaris.)
(September 8, 2021 at 11:33 am)Klorophyll Wrote:(September 8, 2021 at 11:04 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: I think you already know any bullshit any bullshitter shits out can be couched in terms that makes it impossible to disprove. So it is up to a specific bullshitter, that is you, to show your bullshit is different.
I think you also know that if something whose existence is in principle not demonstrable, then it is in principle the same as if it does not exist. Trying to pull a fast one because getting other people to think it exists makes your feel better is craven intellectual dishonesty of the most profoundly disgusting type.
Look, you said that a disembodied being is non-existent. I am fine with you saying there no sufficient evidence, that it's not demonstrable,etc. But non-existence if a far stronger claim, if you can't prove it, I suggest you take it back, and wisely shut it.
I am saying it is as totally and complete indistinguishable from nonexistence as any arbitrary bullshit things any bullshitter ever cared to make up on the spur of amt moment, which is indeed the very maximally strong assertion of no existence as can ever be leveled at any notional thing whatsoever.
That such a maximally strong claim of no existence that can ever be leveled against anything can be leveled with complete assurance against your god shows what caliber of bullshit the notion of the existence of you god actually is.