(September 8, 2021 at 11:47 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:(September 8, 2021 at 11:33 am)Klorophyll Wrote: Look, you said that a disembodied being is non-existent. I am fine with you saying there no sufficient evidence, that it's not demonstrable,etc. But non-existence if a far stronger claim, if you can't prove it, I suggest you take it back, and wisely shut it.
I am saying it is as totally and complete indistinguishable from nonexistence as any arbitrary bullshit things any bullshitter ever cared to make up on the spur of amt moment, which is indeed the very maximally strong assertion of no existence as can ever be leveled at any notional thing whatsoever.
That such a maximally strong claim of no existence that can ever be leveled against anything can be leveled with complete assurance against your god shows what caliber of bullshit the notion of the existence of you god actually is.
Emphasis mine. If you can't distinguish an undetectable entity from a nonexistent one, it's reasonable to treat the undetectable entity as if it were nonexistent. If you can neither detect it with your senses nor with sophisticated equipment, if it has no perceptible effect on your reality and you can't communicate with it, it's a useless hypothetical being that for all intents and purposes exists only in your own imagination