RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
September 13, 2021 at 4:52 pm
(This post was last modified: September 13, 2021 at 4:53 pm by R00tKiT.)
(September 13, 2021 at 4:39 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Please state your axioms and then provide a mathematical proof.
What proof...? It's a material conditional(or material implication). In a material conditional, the proposition "P=>Q" is always true if P is false, regardless of Q.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional
I was just trying to explain to you that mathematical coherence doesn't mean anything. It just means that we thought clearly about something.
(September 13, 2021 at 4:39 pm)Jehanne Wrote: As for the Cosmos, if such is eternal and infinite, then it needs no cause.
We have no experimentally verified theory of an infinite/eternal cosmos. All available data indicates a finite universe.
(September 13, 2021 at 4:36 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: We already know the agent, Kloro. It's called genetics. God isn't painting the roses red....even if there were a god...which, there isn't.
Genetics, just like physical laws, describe some pattern. You repeatedly admitted that natural laws and processes are descriptive.
And a description can't also be an agent.