(October 5, 2021 at 3:55 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Okay, then. Let's apply your wrong rule : I see no footprints of Nudger in my house, Nudger doesn't exist.
You see no footprints of Nudger in your house, therefore it's reasonable to conclude, absent any other clues to the contrary, that Nudger hasn't been in your house. It doesn't prove Nudger hasn't been in your house (certainly it doesn't prove his nonexistence), it's possible he snuck in without leaving footprints for instance, but when all available evidence supports Nudger not having been in your house, you should proceed with your life as though Nudger hasn't been in your house.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.