RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
October 21, 2021 at 2:38 am
(This post was last modified: October 21, 2021 at 2:41 am by Anomalocaris.)
The more pertinent question is why posit a particular “god” equipped with attributes that makes it vitally important to ram him down other people’s throats to be that actual “first cause”?
it seems to me an infinite number of other first causes that can be dreamt up that are completely devoid of any specific worship-worthy attributes that would serves the alledged intellectual purpose of Christian “first cause” just as well, more plausibly, and far less repulsively, than that blatantly contrived baroque horror called the Christian god.
The more Christian spin what seem to them, idiotically, impressively elaborate and ornately impenetrable web of defense around this particular supposed first cause that so happen to be dear to their fragile and warped sense of self worth, the more that hollowness in the center of cobweb dominates the entire appearance of the contraption to the outside observer.
it seems to me an infinite number of other first causes that can be dreamt up that are completely devoid of any specific worship-worthy attributes that would serves the alledged intellectual purpose of Christian “first cause” just as well, more plausibly, and far less repulsively, than that blatantly contrived baroque horror called the Christian god.
The more Christian spin what seem to them, idiotically, impressively elaborate and ornately impenetrable web of defense around this particular supposed first cause that so happen to be dear to their fragile and warped sense of self worth, the more that hollowness in the center of cobweb dominates the entire appearance of the contraption to the outside observer.