Atheism and the existence of peanut butter

[Jehanne]

-and no further explanation or description of causaulity has lead to any revision in the god concepts allegedly premised upon god as the grand nudger.

Because they don't have anything to do with one another, don't suggest or imply anything about one another, and aren't interchangeable as arguments for each other.  So..yeah, no amount of poly explaining the difference between classical notions and quantum mechanics has done a thing for you, huh?

Ground zero.

Don't tell me you think QM violates causality......... For the upteenth time: QM changes the definition of an object, a particle at the quantum level can display counterintuitive phenomena such as quantum entangement. Once we adopt the "quantum definition" of the particle, we can plug the new definition into the assertion of causality and the principle remains valid. This misunderstanding only arises if one tries to fit causality with outdated definitions of particles as in classical mechanics.

I still can't believe people here are seriously second-guessing causality, what else is left if we start shooting down the simplest principles of thought..

Because, it's not as clear-cut as you imagine; I already posted this:

Abraham–Lorentz force

From 21st Century Astronomy, 4th edition:



Ergo, not every event (in physics, something that happens at a particular point in space at a particular time) has a cause; most, in fact, do not.