(November 23, 2021 at 5:48 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(November 22, 2021 at 3:29 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: As I stated before, you can't rule out hidden determinism.You cant rule out pink pixies as well.
You're quoting me out of context. At the macroscopic level, we do have causality. The so-called uncertainty principle in QM implies that we can't have full information of what happens at the subatomic level. This simply means that we can't detect a violation of causality in the first place, that's my point, and that's why QM is irrelevant, it neither clearly confirms nor rejects causality, because as I said above, there is always room for determinism. Acausality in the context of QM means that we are unable to point out the causes of some effect , this certainly doesn't mean that are no causes of these effects.
And because the theory of relativity preserves causality, it's reasonable to assume that the principle is correct.
(November 23, 2021 at 5:48 am)Deesse23 Wrote: For ages it is sais that with the advance of science, the theistics god(s) is pushed further and further "away" into the (yet) unexplored niches of reality. Then there is Kloro, the poster boy for this sterotype, arguing that "causation, therefore god".
That's not really what I am arguing for, you know. Causation is only a premise in the cosmological argument, it doesn't prove the existence of a deity per se.