RE: Atheism and the existence of peanut butter
December 20, 2021 at 8:13 pm
(This post was last modified: December 20, 2021 at 8:22 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:I am familiar with this objection to the arguments from design. But there is a very big problem with it : if the only way to recognize that x is designed is to contrast it with some naturally occuring y. Then we are begging the question of whether y is designed or not. The hidden assumption in this objection is that naturally occuring things aren't designed, which is simply a restatement of naturalism.......No, it doesn't. The fact we can say beyond reasonable doubt that a car was designed then say we have no reason to believe that blade of grass was designed simply because they are both complex. In no way assumes natural things couldn't be designed it's simply pointing out we have no reason to make that logical leap. It neither assumes naturalism nor begs the question.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM