Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 4:13 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
#1
Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
So here Neil DeGrasse Tyson comments that disproving god is similar in disproving a bear in your backyard. If you see no evidence for something, then that counts as evidence against it, until further evidence is presented.



#2
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
Still, its only a strong OPINION you are presenting. There is a place for doubt... There might be God. But who cares, when people wish to thrive.
#3
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
100% lack of evidence for the existence of god is or at least should be considered beyond a reasonable doubt.
So, the court rules in favour of the evidence, case dismissed.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
#4
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
Sort of a burden of proof argument. It's hard to convince theists that the burden of proof lies on them. This is probably because theists are taught since they are very young that their way is true, without question. There is nothing to prove because they simply see things as being that way: That god is real and there is no need to prove His existence. They do not see it as a claim of god's existence, they see it as the fact of god's existence.

Unfortunately, one believing in something strongly is does not suffice in attempting to exclude it from the other multitudes of scientific claims that exist in the world. The claim that there is a divine intelligence that created existence itself is a scientific claim. To deny that claim is not necessarily a claim, in and of itself.

In every other area of life we tend to make claims as to how things are or were, not how things are not and were not. Yet theists feel the need to say that an absence of a claim is a claim in and of itself because that gives them a bit of an intellectual back door where they can start on the offensive instead of actually having to defend their beliefs (because who wants to do that? That takes effort).

So yea, I don't know where you guys live, but there's no bear in my backyard.
“Love is the only bow on Life’s dark cloud. It is the morning and the evening star. It shines upon the babe, and sheds its radiance on the quiet tomb. It is the mother of art, inspirer of poet, patriot and philosopher.

It is the air and light of every heart – builder of every home, kindler of every fire on every hearth. It was the first to dream of immortality. It fills the world with melody – for music is the voice of love.

Love is the magician, the enchanter, that changes worthless things to Joy, and makes royal kings and queens of common clay. It is the perfume of that wondrous flower, the heart, and without that sacred passion, that divine swoon, we are less than beasts; but with it, earth is heaven, and we are gods.” - Robert. G. Ingersoll


#5
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
"If you see no evidence for something, then that counts as evidence against it" is not necessarily always true. The fact that we have not found evidence against a claim is not necessarily evidence that the claim is false, because there may be (a) insufficient investigation of the claim, or (b) the claim being unknowable in principle. An assertion that a claim is false because it has not yet been demonstrated to be true is an argument from ignorance if (a) or (b) applies, which is a logical fallacy.

Hence, in the case of a deistic god who initiated the Big Bang and thereafter left the Universe to proceed under the laws of nature, without any subsequent influence from such a god, a lack of evidence for such a god's existence does not count as evidence against its existence, because we have no known method of investigating such a claim. However, in the case of the God of the Bible, lack of evidence does constitute as evidence against such a god, because we can, for instance, investigate prayer thoroughly and find no evidence that prayer has any divine implications, which is evidence against prayer.
"Faith is the excuse people give when they have no evidence."
  - Matt Dillahunty.
#6
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
(March 8, 2017 at 7:52 am)AceBoogie Wrote: Sort of a burden of proof argument. It's hard to convince theists that the burden of proof lies on them. This is probably because theists are taught since they are very young that their way is true, without question. There is nothing to prove because they simply see things as being that way: That god is real and there is no need to prove His existence. They do not see it as a claim of god's existence, they see it as the fact of god's existence.

Unfortunately, one believing in something strongly is does not suffice in attempting to exclude it from the other multitudes of scientific claims that exist in the world. The claim that there is a divine intelligence that created existence itself is a scientific claim. To deny that claim is not necessarily a claim, in and of itself.

In every other area of life we tend to make claims as to how things are or were, not how things are not and were not. Yet theists feel the need to say that an absence of a claim is a claim in and of itself because that gives them a bit of an intellectual back door where they can start on the offensive instead of actually having to defend their beliefs (because who wants to do that? That takes effort).

So yea, I don't know where you guys live, but there's no bear in my backyard.

I would agree, that the burden of proof is on the one making the claim.    I would disagree, however, that denying is not a claim in itself, and removes one from the burden of proof.   The skeptical position is a neutral one, in which you are not confirming or denying (are not making any claims).  There is a difference between doubt and denial.
#7
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
(March 8, 2017 at 5:26 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I would agree, that the burden of proof is on the one making the claim.    I would disagree, however, that denying is not a claim in itself, and removes one from the burden of proof.   The skeptical position is a neutral one, in which you are not confirming or denying (are not making any claims).  There is a difference between doubt and denial.

Surely denying a claim is different than making a claim. To deny the existence of a bear in my backyard is certainly different than claiming that there is absolutely no bear in my backyard.

However, I am willing to make the claim that there is no bear in my backyard.

I am also willing to make the claim, based on a complete lack of evidence, that there is no god. At least not a christian god.
“Love is the only bow on Life’s dark cloud. It is the morning and the evening star. It shines upon the babe, and sheds its radiance on the quiet tomb. It is the mother of art, inspirer of poet, patriot and philosopher.

It is the air and light of every heart – builder of every home, kindler of every fire on every hearth. It was the first to dream of immortality. It fills the world with melody – for music is the voice of love.

Love is the magician, the enchanter, that changes worthless things to Joy, and makes royal kings and queens of common clay. It is the perfume of that wondrous flower, the heart, and without that sacred passion, that divine swoon, we are less than beasts; but with it, earth is heaven, and we are gods.” - Robert. G. Ingersoll


#8
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
Absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence.  The conclusion can be easily overturned by presenting evidence.
Ball is in your court, religitards.

Meanwhile, here we sit.

[Image: religious-logic.jpg]
#9
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
(March 8, 2017 at 11:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence.  The conclusion can be easily overturned by presenting evidence.
Ball is in your court, religitards.

Meanwhile, here we sit.

[Image: religious-logic.jpg]

Oh no the ball exists in a magic parallel dimension that interacts with the real world in ways that look exactly the same as if no such place exists
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

#10
RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
A world where there is no tangible evidence for something is as good as a world where that thing simply does not exist.

Not sure why this is so hard for people to understand.

And if god is another thing we don't yet understand or don't yet even have the capacity to understand then god is, as Neil DeGrasse Tyson so eloquently put it, an ever decreasing gap of scientific knowledge.
“Love is the only bow on Life’s dark cloud. It is the morning and the evening star. It shines upon the babe, and sheds its radiance on the quiet tomb. It is the mother of art, inspirer of poet, patriot and philosopher.

It is the air and light of every heart – builder of every home, kindler of every fire on every hearth. It was the first to dream of immortality. It fills the world with melody – for music is the voice of love.

Love is the magician, the enchanter, that changes worthless things to Joy, and makes royal kings and queens of common clay. It is the perfume of that wondrous flower, the heart, and without that sacred passion, that divine swoon, we are less than beasts; but with it, earth is heaven, and we are gods.” - Robert. G. Ingersoll





Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 146091 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Disproving the christian (and muslim) god I_am_not_mafia 106 26699 March 15, 2018 at 6:57 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Neil Degrasse Tyson Shuffle 96 20511 August 25, 2015 at 8:06 pm
Last Post: Shuffle
  Kudo's to Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku Free Buddhist 52 10044 April 14, 2015 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains the meaning of life dyresand 7 2546 January 18, 2015 at 8:45 am
Last Post: c172
  Strong Atheism - Arguments disproving God Cheerful Charlie 3 2781 October 20, 2013 at 1:08 am
Last Post: Polaris
  Neil Degrass Tyson is Agnostic bladevalant546 32 10835 September 22, 2013 at 9:57 pm
Last Post: Aeon
  Did Dawkins and Tyson say that and what are the implications. Mark 13:13 126 40011 January 5, 2013 at 9:41 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Neil Degrasse Tyson, Agnostic Whateverist 31 10649 July 10, 2012 at 11:20 am
Last Post: pgrimes15



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)