Nudity, Is It Sexist In This Forum?

[bennyboy]

Probably TMI, but I recently found out Michael Jackson was not circumcised.

Irrelevant.  Penises are not breasts.  Show Michael Jackson's breasts, or yours, or Angelina Jolie's, or step off, bro.  Just. . . step off. . . with the penis talk, cuz nobody wants to talk about penises.  Nobody!

Seriously though, we talk about the above-the-waist nudity, and how women don't get to be as free about revealing their breasts.  But it seems to me that once we head down south, the script flips-- in most scenarios, a nice well-trimmed beaver will receive a MUCH better reception than some dude's bunny-and-basket.

Imagine a girl walks over a vent, Marilyn Monroe style, and it turns out when her dress blows up into the air that she's pantiless.  Tee hees will ensue, maybe a little drooling, and nothing more.  Now imagine Vorlon in his WWII vintage trenchcoat doing the same thing.  Police will arrive shortly.  We know they will.

And so they should!

*PS Fuck! Now I'm imagining! Nooooooooooooooooo. . .*

[bennyboy]

I agree. We should be allowed to see women's boobs as well. :-)

tbh, I think it is America and Britain who have made the case best, simply by having a lot of overweight men.  When you have a bunch of dudes walking the beaches sporting big hairy double-D's, it's very hard to say that my Korean wife (I won't say what she measures, but it's for sure not double-D's) should be required to shamefully conceal what she's sporting.

I know it's subjective, but if I have to see the dudes, I need at least SOME nice female breasts to cleanse the visual palate and keep me from walking into the fucking ocean just to end the man-breast PTSD

[vorlon13]

Probably TMI, but I recently found out Michael Jackson was not circumcised.

Irrelevant.  Penises are not breasts.  Show Michael Jackson's breasts, or yours, or Angelina Jolie's, or step off, bro.  Just. . . step off. . . with the penis talk, cuz nobody wants to talk about penises.  Nobody!

Seriously though, we talk about the above-the-waist nudity, and how women don't get to be as free about revealing their breasts.  But it seems to me that once we head down south, the script flips-- in most scenarios, a nice well-trimmed beaver will receive a MUCH better reception than some dude's bunny-and-basket.

Imagine a girl walks over a vent, Marilyn Monroe style, and it turns out when her dress blows up into the air that she's pantiless.  Tee hees will ensue, maybe a little drooling, and nothing more.  Now imagine Vorlon in his WWII vintage trenchcoat doing the same thing.  Police will arrive shortly.  We know they will.

And so they should!


*PS Fuck! Now I'm imagining! Nooooooooooooooooo. . .*

It's been years since I've been out in public wearing nothing but a trench coat.

(and no, that is not a blanket denial)

[Jackalope]

Random facts are random

Tautological post is tautological.

[vorlon13]

[Little lunch]

I'm not bothered seeing a rod and tackle as long as it's equalised by a good map of Tassie. :-)

[vorlon13]

Rod shots are fine as far as they go, but action poses are better.

Some of the more teratological specimens do garner considerable interest on their own . . . .

[imagine TOS violating example here]

[FatAndFaithless]

So I've been combing through the first half of this thread, and it seems to be a lot of the same points over and over, and also boob jokes. Was there a decision made yet on the policy, or is it still under discussion?

[pocaracas]

LOL
I don't think any decision will be made.
Business as usual - Females must have breasts and nether regions covered; males are only required to keep their nether regions covered.

Except for the special hidden mythical zone known as Area69...

[FatAndFaithless]

LOL
I don't think any decision will be made.
Business as usual - Females must have breasts and nether regions covered; males are only required to keep their nether regions covered.

Except for the special hidden mythical zone known as Area69...

Gotcha, that's what I thought was most likely as well.