Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 25, 2024, 2:06 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Non-religious evidence for existence of God
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
So the evidence so far just to sum it up is that muhammad knew that buildings would rise up to be as tall as mountains, I still find it strange that he used the word "rise" instead of "built". When you say something has risen up to be the height of a mountain it usually means to move from a lower position to a higher one

Verb
Move from a lower position to a higher one.

So the buildings of Mecca didn't already exist then become higher, they were built to be high in the first place.

But ok lets just say Muhammad did predict that.

Then you say you have proof that evolution didn't happen you would have to give your proof to biologists and experts though rather than posting it on this forum.

Then you have the proof that shoes can talk....if you put a speaker in them.

Oh and noahs ark, that's only been found about 10 or more times before and turned out to be a hoax but we will have to see about that one.

Also can you show me the hadith where it says noahs flood was local and to just gather local animals?


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
I hereby nominate Ryantology's signature for Signature Banner of 2013. No other contenders need apply, just go home, you've lost before you even arrived.

Also I highly doubt that the "evidence" against biology even exists, much less that he has to trouble a biologist with it. Something tells me we lowly forum jockeys could tear his "evidence" apart without any effort. I say bring it forth.
Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
I just had a prophecy.

Before I even opened the OP, I predicted that it would be a teleological argument.

Lo and behold, I see Michael Behe's long refuted 'Irreducible complexity' crap.

I am a Prophet, BJBUM. For the uninitiated, that is 'Blow Jobs be Upon Me'.

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
(March 27, 2013 at 8:05 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: I just had a prophecy.

Before I even opened the OP, I predicted that it would be a teleological argument.

Lo and behold, I see Michael Behe's long refuted 'Irreducible complexity' crap.

I am a Prophet, BJBUM. For the uninitiated, that is 'Blow Jobs be Upon Me'.

You know, given how little stock we atheists put in prophets, and how freaking obvious a bad argument would be in this context, reverse psychology might have worked a little better. Tongue

Because- and this is a sentence I so rarely get to use- I would suck so many dicks to disprove a prophet. Tongue
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
(March 27, 2013 at 7:34 pm)paulpablo Wrote: So the evidence so far just to sum it up is that muhammad knew that buildings would rise up to be as tall as mountains, I still find it strange that he used the word "rise" instead of "built". When you say something has risen up to be the height of a mountain it usually means to move from a lower position to a higher one

Verb
Move from a lower position to a higher one.

So the buildings of Mecca didn't already exist then become higher, they were built to be high in the first place.

But ok lets just say Muhammad did predict that.

Then you say you have proof that evolution didn't happen you would have to give your proof to biologists and experts though rather than posting it on this forum.

Then you have the proof that shoes can talk....if you put a speaker in them.

Oh and noahs ark, that's only been found about 10 or more times before and turned out to be a hoax but we will have to see about that one.

Also can you show me the hadith where it says noahs flood was local and to just gather local animals?


Quote:Then you say you have proof that evolution didn't happen you would have to give your proof to biologists and experts though rather than posting it on this forum.

if i meet some biologist i would give him my view on this


Quote:Then you have the proof that shoes can talk....if you put a speaker in them.

but there was no speaker at the time of Muhammed nor was it electricity, so to even mention that shoes will speak is clear enough prophecy for people who want to Think.

Let say like this, God showed future to Muhammed and when he saw our period he saw also this strange thing for him, a shoe wich talk, how could he know that there were speaker in them??? he dont even know what is electricity. if you were in 6th Century and looked into the future and saw shoes speaking you would not Think that there is speaker in them.

only ignorant atheist can deny this prophecy of muhammed, and this isjust Little i have a lot of more prophecies coming true

like this





Quote:Oh and noahs ark, that's only been found about 10 or more times before and turned out to be a hoax but we will have to see about that one.

i Believe that ship on the mountain is Noah's ark.



Quote:Also can you show me the hadith where it says noahs flood was local and to just gather local animals?


Was the Flood a Local Disaster or was It Global?

Those who deny the reality of the Flood, support their stance with the assertion that a worldwide flood is impossible. However, their denial of any flood whatsoever is also directed as an argument for disbelief.
Yet the Qur’an was revealed by Allah and is the only unaltered Divine book. The Qur’an gives a very different account of the Flood than the Pentateuch and the other flood legends narrated in various cultures. The Pentateuch, the name given to the first five books of the Old Testament, says that the flood was cosmic and that it covered the whole world. Yet the Qur’an does not offer such as assertion, indeed on the contrary, the relevant verses imply that the Flood was regional and did not cover the whole world but only drowned Nuh’s (as) people who had been warned by Nuh (as)and so were punished.

When the Flood narrations of the Old Testament and the Qur’an are examined, this difference is plain. The Old Testament, which has been subject to so many alterations and additions throughout its history that it can truly be said that almost nothing of the original remains, describes how the Flood began as follows;
And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD (Genesis, 6:5-8)

However, in the Qur’an, it is clearly shown that it was not the whole world, but only Nuh’s (as)people who were destroyed. Just as Hud (as)was sent only to ‘Ad (Surah Hud: 50); Salih (as)was sent to Thamud (Surah Hud: 61) and all the other prophets prior to Muhammad (saas)were sent only to their own peoples, Nuh (as)was sent only to his people and the flood caused only Nuh’s (as)people to perish:

We sent Nuh to his people (with a mission): "I have come to you with a Clear Warning: That ye serve none but Allah: Verily I do fear for you the penalty of a grievous day." (Surah Hud: 25-26)
Those who perished were people who totally disregarded Prophet Nuh’s (as)proclamation of the message and persisted on rebellion. Relevant verses are explicit:

But they rejected him, and We delivered him, and those with him, in the Ark: but We overwhelmed in the flood those who rejected Our signs. They were indeed a blind people! (Surat al-A‘raf: 64)

But they denied him so We rescued him, and all those with him, in the Ark and We made them the successors and We drowned the people who denied Our Signs. See the final fate of those who were warned! (Surah Yunus: 73)

Besides, in the Qur’an, Allah remarks that He does not destroy a community unless a messenger has been sent to it. Destruction can only take place if a warner has already arrived among a particular people and the warner is belied. Allah states in the Qur’an:

Nor was thy Lord the one to destroy a population until He had sent to its centre a messenger, rehearsing to them Our Signs; nor are We going to destroy a population except when its members practice iniquity. (Surat al-Qasas: 59)

It is revealed in the Qur’an that Allah will not destroy people to whom He has not sent any messengers. As a warner, Nuh (as)had been sent only to his people. Therefore, Allah did not destroy the communities who had not been sent a warner, but only Nuh’s (as)people.
From these statements in the Qur’an, we can be certain that the Flood was a regional disaster, not a cosmic one. Excavations made in the archaeological region where the flood is supposed to have occurred - which we will examine below - show that the flood was not a cosmic event affecting the whole world, but a very.


Were all the Animals Taken on Board?

The interpreters of the Bible believe that Nuh (as)took all animal species on earth on board the Ark and that animals were saved from extinction thanks to Nuh (as). According to this belief, a pair of every animal species on earth were brought together and put on board.
Those who defend this assertion doubtless have to face serious difficulties in many respects. The question of how the animal species taken aboard were fed, how they were housed on the Ark, or how they were isolated from each other are impossible to answer. Moreover, the question remains: how were animals from different continents brought together - mammals in the poles, kangaroos in Australia or the bison peculiar to America? Moreover, there follow more questions as to how very dangerous animals - venomous ones like snakes, scorpions and wild animals - were caught and how they could be sustained away from their natural habitats until the flood abated.
These are the accounts in the distorted Old Testament which cannot be answered. In the Qur’an, there is no statement implying that all the animal species on earth were taken on board. As we have noted before, the Flood took place in a certain region. Therefore, the animals taken on board could only have been those living in the region where Nuh’s (as) people resided.
However, it is evident that it is impossible even to collect all the animal species living in that region. It is difficult to think of Nuh (as)and a few number of believers besides him (Surah Hud: 40) going in all directions and setting out to collect two each of hundreds of animal species in their surroundings. It is even more highly improbable for them to have collected specimens of the insect species living in their region, and, moreover, to discriminate the males from the females! This is the reason why it is more probable that the animals collected were those that could easily be caught and sustained, and were, therefore, domestic animals especially useful to man. The Prophet Nuh (as)was most likely to have taken on board such animals as cows, sheep, horses, poultry, camels and the like, because these were the primary animals that would have been needed for establishing a new life in a region which would have lost a great deal of its livestock because of the Flood.
Here the important point is that Allah’s command to Nuh (as)to collect the animals may be directed to the collecting of the animals required for the new life to be established after the Flood rather than to protecting the genus of animals. Since the flood was regional, the extinction of animal species could not have been a possibility. It is most likely that after the flood, animals from other regions would have migrated to that area in the course of time, and re-populated the region with its old liveliness. What was important was the life to be established in the region right after the flood, and the animals gathered would have been collected basically for this purpose.
Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
Quote:Let say like this, God showed future to Muhammed and when he saw our period he saw also this strange thing for him, a shoe wich talk, how could he know that there were speaker in them??? he dont even know what is electricity. if you were in 6th Century and looked into the future and saw shoes speaking you would not Think that there is speaker in them.
He revealed all the secrets of the world to him, but wasn't smart enough to have insight on technology?

Quote:only ignorant atheist can deny this prophecy of muhammed, and this isjust Little i have a lot of more prophecies coming true
Are you sure you didn't mean: "Only ignorant theists can accept such a vague prophecy."

It doesn't matter how many you have. If one is wrong, then something strange is up; considering it's the apparent 'divine word of God'
(March 30, 2013 at 9:51 pm)ThatMuslimGuy2 Wrote: Never read anything immoral in the Qur'an.
Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
(March 28, 2013 at 5:29 am)ciko83 Wrote: ..only ignorant atheist can deny this prophecy of muhammed..

Mr. Sicko,
In my ignorance I laugh, scoff and verily mock your pitiful attempt at providing non-religious proof for your god. Surely a god that could have made your god would be a far greater god .. if not quite so great a god as that which made it. Since you obviously have no answer to my proof from Tupperware, I must assume that you realize every creator must have a creator if creators are truly a necessary thing.

Proof from Tupperware:

Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
so god created the universe.

How exactly?

Theists never supply any detail they just go "he just did alright!" and are content to leave it at that.

It's lazy and bugs the shit out of me.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
@downbeatplumb

What if God was Being/Existence?
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.
Reply
RE: Non-religious evidence for existence of God
(March 28, 2013 at 1:37 pm)Tex Wrote: @downbeatplumb

What if God was Being/Existence?

@Tex

Whoa! If God just was existence then I'm down with god. I've never known quite what you all were on about when it comes to 'god'. But if all you mean by "god" is the sum total of everything there is, then no problem. I certainly believe in what exists.

I just thought it had something to do with coming first, creating everything from nothing, commandments, judgment day and eternally ever after. Thanks for clearing that up.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Can you be a "Non religious muslim"? Woah0 31 1915 August 22, 2022 at 8:22 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 7201 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Persistent Non-Symbolic Experiences Ahriman 0 560 August 18, 2021 at 4:05 pm
Last Post: Ahriman
  Questions about the European renaissance and religion to non believers Quill01 6 718 January 31, 2021 at 7:16 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 4494 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  God as a non-creator Fake Messiah 13 1763 January 21, 2020 at 8:36 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Being can come from non-being Alex K 55 7503 January 15, 2020 at 10:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  10 Syllogistic arguments for Gods existence Otangelo 84 11450 January 14, 2020 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Being cannot come from Non-being Otangelo 147 14440 January 7, 2020 at 7:08 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Quantum Physics Proves God’s Existence blue grey brain 15 1966 January 2, 2019 at 11:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)