An unorthodox belief in God.

[Nine]

Translation: " I am not even considering your evidence as evidence, but I am going to keep " ASKING for it!"

I gave it a look, it didn't come anywhere close to anything I'd call evidence. It's all either been thoroughly debunked before or doesn't even make sense at all.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Great research Doc, looks like the same drivel we see here everyday. Most of its just a list of things with no reasoning behind it. I'm not wasting my time reading pages of your rambling when in reality you have nothing of value to contribute.

Translation: " I am not even considering your evidence as evidence, but I am going to keep " ASKING for it!"

In example; I provided a list of 30 historical references to jesus, all but one historians, the one a document. How could one claim jesus did not exist, and 29 historians wrote about him, plus the Toledot Yeshu.

Show us what research you've done on that thread.

Point it out to us, because I can't see any. You've just pasted things like names or saying things like 'ontology' with no clarifier.

Did you study ontology? What did you deduce from your research and what led you to that conclusion?

Show your working.

[mickiel]

Great research Doc, looks like the same drivel we see here everyday. Most of its just a list of things with no reasoning behind it. I'm not wasting my time reading pages of your rambling when in reality you have nothing of value to contribute.

Translation: " I am not even considering your evidence as evidence, but I am going to keep " ASKING for it!"

In example; I provided a list of 30 historical references to jesus, all but one historians, the one a document. How could one claim jesus did not exist, and 29 historians wrote about him, plus the Toledot Yeshu.

Translation: " I am not even considering your evidence as evidence, but I am going to keep " ASKING for it!"

I gave it a look, it didn't come anywhere close to anything I'd call evidence. It's all either been thoroughly debunked before or doesn't even make sense at all.

What!! 29 historians recording jesus existed makes no sense?

Good grief! Will denial ever cease?

[LastPoet]

Translation: " I am not even considering your evidence as evidence, but I am going to keep " ASKING for it!"

Educate yourself. You can't argue a god into existence. If you are going to claim something, give us a precise method to detect that god. All that you have shown in your link is rethoric, aka, bullshit.

Insanity, do you really think this guy is using reason? Rethoric is NOT reason!

[Fidel_Castronaut]

If you look at the thread Mick cited which proves his 'research', what you'll actually read is a guy having a conversation with himself.

[mickiel]

Translation: " I am not even considering your evidence as evidence, but I am going to keep " ASKING for it!"

In example; I provided a list of 30 historical references to jesus, all but one historians, the one a document. How could one claim jesus did not exist, and 29 historians wrote about him, plus the Toledot Yeshu.

Show us what research you've done on that thread.

Point it out to us, because I can't see any. You've just pasted things like names or saying things like 'ontology' with no clarifier.

Did you study ontology? What did you deduce from your research and what led you to that conclusion?

Show your working.

I gave the lists; google them. Research them. I gave a list of 30 historical references to jesus, google each one and see for yourself.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Show us what research you've done on that thread.

Point it out to us, because I can't see any. You've just pasted things like names or saying things like 'ontology' with no clarifier.

Did you study ontology? What did you deduce from your research and what led you to that conclusion?

Show your working.

I gave the lists; google them. Research them. I gave a list of 30 historical references to jesus, google each one and see for yourself.

No.

You said you've researched the topics you've cited on that thread, and I chose one (ontology).

So show us your working. What did you deduce from your research into ontological discourse and what sources did you consult?

How did you arrive at the conclusion that god exists through your research into ontology? Show us.

You've researched it right? So it shouldn't be hard to paste your actual research here.

[mickiel]

If you look at the thread Mick cited which proves his 'research', what you'll actually read is a guy having a conversation with himself.

You don't really want evidence, you want a dart board to throw your rants at. You will reject all things thrown at you, and you know it. This EVIDENCE wall is something you hide behind.

Evasion ; constant denial; then you start with more defense; discredit, insult, and then get rid of it.

[LastPoet]

Evasion ; constant denial; then you start with more defense; discredit, insult, and then get rid of it.

Denial of what? The absurd claim of something called a god that isn't even precisely defined let alone self-evident to all others.

You are the one denying that all you have is a crapload of bullshit to sell. Thinking yourself as original, with any knowledge. Can one believe the arrogance of these idiots?

[mickiel]

I gave the lists; google them. Research them. I gave a list of 30 historical references to jesus, google each one and see for yourself.

No.

You said you've researched the topics you've cited on that thread, and I chose one (ontology).

So show us your working. What did you deduce from your research into ontological discourse and what sources did you consult?

How did you arrive at the conclusion that god exists through your research into ontology? Show us.

You've researched it right? So it shouldn't be hard to paste your actual research here.

http://www.iep.utm.edu/ont-arg/
Sure, we can start with this: and after you step on it I can continue with more on just that; after you mangle the next, I'll give the next.