The Paradox of Power....

[Elpidio Chuy]

This does not answer my question.We talking about humans here.homosexual behaviour among animals is engaged in for a variety of reasons having nothing to do with sex. In many cases it is only a ‘ritualized form of aggression’.

again,If homosexuality is right, then how come two people of the same sex not produce a child?

Anatomy and genetics, dipshit. And your appeal to nature is fallacious. But don't take my word for it. Look up "appeal to nature".

Anatomy and genetics, "dipshit". You know I can call the same.

ah found it
"appeal to nature"
An appeal to nature is an argument or rhetorical tactic in which it is proposed that "a thing is good because it is 'natural', or bad because it is 'unnatural'".

This is actually supporting me,does homosexuality meet it's function.

again,If homosexuality is right, then how come two people of the same sex not produce a child?

---

If homosexuality is right, then how come two people of the same sex not produce a child?

Aww, lookit how cute you are.

Human beings use sex for reasons other than procreation (if every sexual act produced a child, our species would have choked itself out quite some time ago).

By making the claim that sexual acts which do not produced offspring are somehow inherently wrong, you are forced to the conclusion that sex between people past child-bearing age or sex between people infertile with each other is somehow wrong.

I haven't taken a psychology course in a mort of years, but if I remember correctly, the clinical term for your premise and its conclusion is 'blindingly, mind-numbingly stupid'.

Boru

does homosexuality meet it's function? I don't mean the use of pleasure but I mean does it meet it's natural purpose?

again,If homosexuality is right, then how come two people of the same sex not produce a child?