RE: Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence
October 26, 2015 at 5:24 pm
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2015 at 5:24 pm by Faith No More.)
(October 26, 2015 at 2:32 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Science is supposed to be objective. The minute you say that one set of data requires more or less scrutiny than another you inject more subjectivity into the results. Nevertheless the most recent psi studies are very robust something ever critics have acknowledged. The early posts might have been true 20 years ago. Today its a different story.
Being objective doesn't mean having the same standard for every experiment. That would be absurd. Some experiments are more susceptible to bias, and the study has to be tailored to that.
Because that's what objective really means in this context. It means eliminating bias as much as possible.
Unfortunately for your pet claims, every time corrections are made to eliminate bias, the results disappear. That's exactly what we would expect from a false claim.