(November 30, 2015 at 8:57 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(November 30, 2015 at 8:45 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: I don't see why in regards to the woman's right to her own body a naturally occurring tumor or a naturally occurring fetus would make a difference? The woman still has a right to decide what happens inside of her own body.
So to clarify, if a woman decides she does not want to give birth to her baby, you see nothing wrong with her having an abortion for all 9 months, all the way up until birth?
I'm assuming the answer is that you see nothing wrong with this, but I just want to make sure. If that is your answer then this is where we split.
Yes, its a question of bodily rights, she should choose what happens in her body. Why would it matter if its 9 months? We don't grant the same rights to children who have exited the vagina, why should a fetus be any different? If a two year old needs an organ transplant he or she needs to have a donor, you cant just use someone elses body without their permission, even if that person is dead. What your suggesting is special rights for a fetus, rights that no birthed human has and your suggesting that a woman should not have same rights as a corpse.