(March 8, 2016 at 7:47 pm)AJW333 Wrote:(March 7, 2016 at 9:02 pm)abaris Wrote: God, according to your definition is omniscient and omnipotent. So the above is shit. This is what it's actually is. As it always is when things get uncomfortable.If God used his omnipotence to thwart all acts of evil, then freewill ceases to exist. That won't happen because God has guaranteed free will.
By the way, in case you missed it, what's your proof for the supernatural existing?
Concerning proof of supernatural, I doubt there is anything I could write that you would believe. I'd be wasting my time trying.
(March 7, 2016 at 9:05 pm)Kitan Wrote: Could have
If god is so great, doesn't he want his creations to be the best?
If god is as powerful as he is, he can absolutely thwart evil. In fact, that would be the precise act of any god. I suppose we create super heroes to thwart the evil that the creation of god could not accomplish.
I want my children to be the best they can be but do I micromanage their lives for them? That would be a nightmare! Especially since they are adults with their own children.
When the end of the world comes, God will put a stop to all evil, until then, we will see more and more of it, just as the Bible predicted.
(March 7, 2016 at 10:13 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Perhaps someone should contact the accreditation folks and tell them that a university let one of theirs got away with a degree in science and a failure to understand the difference between tentatively accepting something as "most plausible" and a faith-decree. If you truly can't understand what "I believe this only to the degree it has been proven" means, then you're not a scientist, no matter what your degree says.In my brief time at this forum, I have been asked over and over again to prove the supernatural, and been derided for not providing an "acceptable" proof. When I ask for proof of abiogenesis, I see a completely different standard being applied. You accept abiogenesis on the basis that it is "most plausible," with no proof whatsoever. How is that a more credible position than me accepting the supernatural as "most plausible" on the basis of both personal experience and the worldwide, centuries old existence of countless testimonies? At least there are hundreds of thousands of people claiming to have witnessed the supernatural and yet not one who has witnessed abiogenesis.
(March 7, 2016 at 10:25 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: This liar does not have a science degree unless he found one in a cereal box.
Put up or shut up. $10,0000 says I do.
(March 7, 2016 at 10:27 pm)abaris Wrote: My money is on christian college. About as helpful as used toiled paper in the real world.
UNSW. Inside the top 50 in the world. Check it out.
Doesn't matter whether you do, but the embarassment of of you spouting sub-grade-school level ignorance would surely knock down a peg any university which gave you a relevant science degree. Fuck off, you lying cunt!
Mr. Hanky loves you!
