pop morality

[Drich]

---

So.. What? you want me to amend my list to you and rocket avoided my senerio by saying you don't think science will ever justify the claim???

Are you intentionally missing the point I made? The point being if SOCIETY accepted Pedophilia then your morality that is tied to Society would also demand that you would accept Pedophilia otherwise you would be deemed Immoral just like a member of the westbrough baptist for hating Homosexuals.

That's the point! Address that! Don't be a coward and address the what if.. 35 years ago someone like you could also argue that science could never be used to justify homosexuality. So then take that element off the table as it is moot either way and Explain to me how you could maintain the Pedophilia was wrong if it not only became legal, but that celebrities endorsed it and hooked up with kids? Follow the path homosexuality was 'normalized' in the last few years then tell me how you would combat the evil of pedophilia if infact it took the same path!

That is what I have been screaming from the roof tops that none of you has the courage to even acknowledge or address!

Again just like those living in Nazi Germany, when society turned, they too had to follow, because they like you all completely depend on society to define right and wrong, so when society says something very very wrong like pedophilia is now right, you all have nothing to argue that with. You have no way of standing against a corrupt or perverse society. You have to follow society because your identity is chained to what society says is moral or immoral.

You trying to stand against society if it ever accepted pedophilia would be looked at no differently than a 'radical christian' protesting infanticide outside of an abortion clinic or a 'radical chriatian' protest a gay marriage. You would then be the subject of the immorality society levies against Christianity now.

Can you see the danger of unchecked pop morality?

---

I'm telling you that I wouldn't care if "science" rejected the claim. As I previously stated, I would not be convinced otherwise. I've repeatedly told you that society doesn't dictate my morality as you believe it does; You refuse to accept that.

Yes, I also mentioned that I don't believe that "science" specifically  will come to disprove or reject the claim that adults having sex with children is wrong. So what? Nature clearly demonstrates that a child's undeveloped physiology is incompatible with adults for the purposes of sexual intercourse. I was simply letting you know that I find your hypothetical nonsensical. That's allowed, right? 

It doesn't matter, because "science" has NEVER been the reason that I consider acts of pedophilia immoral. I consider it so, because it causes direct physical and emotional harm to children. That would be completely observable and knowable to me, despite a shift in "scientific" consensus, or which way society happened to be leaning a given point in time. Whether or not these acts cause harm to children is not a matter of debate or opinion. I've transported and provided pre-hospital treatment to children with genital trauma/sexual penetration injuries as on more than one occasion, and I know for a fact that this is true; The damage is real. I am completely confident in stating that nothing would be capable of convincing me otherwise. 
                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Can I see the danger in unchecked popular morality? Sure. That's why I determine what's moral or immoral through careful self-reflection and consideration of the potential for and existence of harm to others, as opposed to consulting celebrity Tweets. 

                                                                                                                                                                                                      
Many of my moral positions happen to be in line with current society and even some Biblical principles, however some are not. I've never been afraid to adhere those principles that I feel to be morally correct, in spite of facing opposition from the majority. Admittedly, I care very little as to whether people in like or approve me in general, so I'm certain that has significant bearing on the matter. It's true, nonetheless.

So before i take you down yet again for target lock/focusing on the wrong aspect of the discussion, may i ask you to outline my position in relation to what you said here.

Because you just made/validated my argument for 'self righteousness.'