(April 4, 2016 at 3:35 am)TubbyTubby Wrote:It is not mythology to posit that the cause of life (and the universe) was via a creator.(April 4, 2016 at 3:05 am)Huggy74 Wrote: That is a double standard.
If you want to insist that someone has faith in science in order to make you feel better about your personal belief in mythology then go ahead, fill your boots.
(April 4, 2016 at 3:35 am)TubbyTubby Wrote: Abiogenesis is the most plausible hypothesis of how life startedNot when it violates everything we see in nature. It is far more plausible to attribute the cause of life to something that operates outside the scope of natural process, ie a supernatural cause.
(April 4, 2016 at 3:35 am)TubbyTubby Wrote: Supernatural alien god breathing everything into existence is the most utterly unlikely hypothesis without evidence.The evidence for God is the creation of life from non-life, unless you can provide evidence that this creation happens through natural causes.