(April 6, 2016 at 10:03 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:(April 6, 2016 at 9:56 pm)AAA Wrote: Who are you to rate the universe's functionality? You're doing it too. And the design is as good as it can get compared to theoretical alternatives. What do you expect to see in cellular biology 100 million years from now that they do not yet have?
The difference is that I'm pointing it out the lack of deliberate design to indicate the lack of deliberate design, while you are pointing out what you have admitted is a flawed design that innately enables suffering and claiming it's evidence of a perfect, all-knowing benevolent designer.
I don't remember admitting that the design was flawed. Aren't you tired of the laptop analogy or do you not get it? Our bodies were not intended to deal with as many carcinogens as they are. It is because we pump tons of harmful chemicals into our environment hourly.