(April 12, 2016 at 12:45 am)AAA Wrote: Ahh, so it's the publishing that makes it science, not the critical analysis of the person's work/hypothesis.
Critical being the operative word here. ID isn't accepted by science. Show me one ID thesis having graduated to an accepted scientific theory. I hope you know the term scientific theory as opposed to you having a theory. Which would be the first step in understanding peer review.