(April 12, 2016 at 10:42 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(April 12, 2016 at 10:40 am)Drich Wrote: If by weirdly arbitrary you mean a definition provided by the Mayo clinic, then yes I would be forced to agree.
At what point in the OP did I EVER infer one needed to be or had to be 'cured?'
Again, you've over stepped in your assessment.
I simply asked a question one that you seem to be trying to red herring away with a strawman.
When did management ever include enabling?
At what point in the OP did I ever say I was not comfortable with transexual progressing into anything?
I simply asked a question.
Again treatment was never on the table for discussion. Just the identification of GID as a legit mental disorder, and if GID is a legit disorder then again why are the mentally ill setting policy for society?
nuupe I don't care what transsexual will or will not do. This discussion is not about how they live their lives. I honestly do not care what people do to themselves or how they want to live so long as it does not infringe on those who want nothing to do with their brand of crazy.
So...then what is the point of your post exactly? You have no position at all? I'm now completely at a loss for what the hell you are even saying other then, "ew, yucky."
At this point all I've done is ask a question, based on a clinically observed definition. Should mentally Ill people set policy for 99% of everyone else in society?