(May 20, 2016 at 9:15 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:AAA Wrote:Yeah, it depends on your perspective, but biologists agree that it was designed. The question is was it designed by random mutation and natural selection, an intelligent designer, or some third alternative? The first one is becoming less reasonable as we begin to learn about the complex regulatory mechanisms and interplay between the different enzymes.
If you're claiming that biologists think the first one is 'becoming less reasonable', you're either astonishingly misinformed, bonkers, or outright lying. If you're just trying to make it sound like biologists think that, you're dishonest.
And by the way, Steve, that last sentence of AAA's is an example of an argument from incredulity.
Ugh...ALL of this has been explained to Junk Status before. He just keeps coming back to regurgitate the same utter failure of an argument over and over, pretending like he's never heard any of these rebuttals before. I'm starting to wonder if he is nothing more than an elaborate troll.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.