(April 3, 2009 at 6:00 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: We always seem to come back to this line about proof. I'm certainly not saying proof is possible, I'd hope you get that by now. So where does this leave your contentions? Groundless it would seem.
You may not be claiming it but the standard method of establishing something is evidence based, each and every claim is assessed by that method ... if you want to make a claim that is excepted from those standards or rules then you must make a special case for it. That we (and I am not the only one) have continued to argue that you haven't made that case essentially means your argument is special pleading. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, you haven't provided any therefore it is safe to assume that what you claim has no (ZERO, NADA, ZIP) basis in truth and the claimant is either a fraud or deluded.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
