I don't feel the rules are sexist. If it became completely lawful to show bare-breasted women on these forums without legal recourse, I'm positive we'd see them. Vice versa in regards to bare-chested men; if it became unlawful, the pec shots would disappear from the forums. AF is acting in it's interest by complying with the existing law.
I would agree with others in suggesting that the issue here is actually whether the existing laws regarding nudity are sexist, rather than AF's observance of/adherence to the law. They break the law, the board comes down, no AF; Seems pretty simple.
I don't how see further limiting what members are permitted to see on a private forum, beyond the the requirements law, could go anywhere towards addressing your actual concerns. It could possibly serve as an "in your face" or a "how ya like them apples?"....IF Atheist Forums were somehow responsible for laws as they exists.
But, they're not.
I would agree with others in suggesting that the issue here is actually whether the existing laws regarding nudity are sexist, rather than AF's observance of/adherence to the law. They break the law, the board comes down, no AF; Seems pretty simple.
I don't how see further limiting what members are permitted to see on a private forum, beyond the the requirements law, could go anywhere towards addressing your actual concerns. It could possibly serve as an "in your face" or a "how ya like them apples?"....IF Atheist Forums were somehow responsible for laws as they exists.
But, they're not.